To refresh - I tried to argue that a play script - that sacrosanct piece of great art that we try for - is just a blue print for the final performances that will take to the stage; and that directors, actors, stage designers,etc etc are all part of that production that erupts onto that stage, be it in the backwaters of a village hall to the Olivier at NT.
However, two of you out there have had problems with this. First the author who does not quite see it like that - or rather in most cases it's the estate of the author being extra protective about the dead author's text and don't see it quite like that.
In this case and in the case of many other battles it was a certain Samuel Beckett estate which guards dear old Sam's words with their life with threats of litigation. The most famous incident of this was the one some years ago when the actress Fiona Shaw and her director Deborah Warner tried to do a Becket production.
"..., more than 10 years ago, I performed Footfalls in London, in a production directed by Deborah Warner which we planned to take to Paris. But we never did: famously, it was closed after its short run by the Beckett estate. Beckett had died only five years previously and I think there was still a great deal of sensitivity to any interpretative change. I remember the French co-producer saying with some panache, "Sometimes a vacuum is more important than a presence" - a generous theory given that their investment of £25,000 had just been lost."
But then there was the case of the Gilbert and Sullivan operettas which were jealously guarded through the life of the copyright (fifty years then - seventy years now) by the Doyle Carte Opera Company; only licencing other performances to amateur groups, whilst they annually toured around Britain with virtually the same original productions on an annual basis. However, this was all to change with the end of the D'Oyly Carte monopoly on these performances, when the copyright on Gilbert's words expired in 1961 (Sullivan’s music had already come out of copyright at the end of 1950). But it took until 1980 and a centenary production of The Pirates Of Penzance in New York at Joseph Papp's open air theatre in Central Park to really bring the operettas into the 20th century.
So if you budding directors out there want to take an old out of date script and knock it into shape, you just have to wait for seventy years after the playwright's kicked the proverbial - or perhaps you writers out there should get a life!
But then that brings me onto the other problem presented to me - the one of the author who has done a new version of Twelfth Night. (Shakespeare's safe by the way; he's way out of copyright - although there are some audience members out there still wanting the plays to be done properly (ie as Shakespeare wrote them - with nice Elizabethan costumes and lovely lovely sets (Sorry, but Shakespeare didn't have much setting, but never mind!) Sorry about that private rant at a certain stick in the mud kind of audience member!!!
Still back to the problem; there's a new version of Twelfth Night out there tried and tested - and even published. But it doesn't sell. Playwright wants to know why - and asks directors. The answer he gets is that he's not included any stage directions in the published version. They don't know how to put it on!
You can't win. That's the fact of it, playwrights. We just can't win.
Too few directions and they complain. Too many and they complain.
Well, we'll all just have to go our own sweet ways and hope for the best. And whilst we're all still in living, breathing copyright, if the directors want any help putting on our plays - with modern methods of communication they can get in touch and ask for suggestions. It really is that simple.



